Skip this site's navigation and go to its main content


Receive Updates From Heritage

Receive Updates From Heritage

The Heritage Foundation
Leadership for America

Our Vision

Building an America where freedom, opportunity, prosperity, and civil society flourish.

About The Heritage Foundation

Founded in 1973, The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institution—a think tank—whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. We believe the principles and ideas of the American Founding are worth conserving and renewing. As policy entrepreneurs, we believe the most effective solutions are consistent with those ideas and principles.


Military Strike Threatens U.S.-Pakistan Relations

Posted June 12th, 2008 at 10:19am in Protect America 2 Print This Post Print This Post

A highly unfortunate U.S. military incident on Afghanistan-Pakistan border this week may strain the U.S.-Pakistan relationship. More than a dozen bombs were dropped near Pakistan’s tribal areas, killed 11 Pakistani paramilitary troops, according to press reports.

Confronting terrorists that have found safe haven along the Afghanistan-Pakistan border is complicated. The coalition forces in Afghanistan cooperate as best they can with their Pakistani counterparts on the Pakistan side of the border, but given the constant crossing back and forth by the terrorists between countries and the lack of government control of the tribal areas in Pakistan, this type of incident does not come wholly unexpected.

It is crucial that the U.S. and Pakistan work more closely toward rooting out terrorist safe havens in the tribal areas that threaten Pakistan, the region and the international community.

Instead of engaging in tactical negotiations with militants to buy time, Pakistan needs to develop a strategic approach to dealing with the tribal areas that is closely coordinated with and supported by the United States. Islamabad and Washington must develop a strategy that relies on economic, political and military tools to undermine the terrorists in the region.

Pakistan is passing through a tumultuous period, including a rocky transition to democracy and coping with a string of bombings that have murdered thousands of Pakistani civilians and military personnel over the last year. The U.S. should be careful not to tip the balance in favor of those anti-U.S. elements who might wish to seek a break in the relationship. Although the U.S.-Pakistan relationship is facing some serious challenges over the terrorism issue, it is critical that Washington continue to demonstrate its support for the new democratically elected government and to continue its military cooperation with this critical partner in the war on terror.

For more information on the challenges with Pakistan, please read my recent paper, “Preserving Coalition Government Key to U.S. Objectives in Pakistan.”

Tags: , , ,

2 Responses to “Military Strike Threatens U.S.-Pakistan Relations”

  1. Ken Tristal on at said:

    I think if we would be less apogetic even now and more agressive, as we should have in the beginning, such tiptoeing would not be required now. Not using our well designed arsenal to rediculous rules of engagement putting our own military in harm’s way has dragged this farce on for far too long. In battle you are to win; in war you are to win, nothing less should be every sane person’s ultimate end and desire: to kill and destroy with military intelligence as up to date as possible is a quicker method for all to get home as soon as possible.

  2. Tim Rafferty, Greensburg, PA on at said:

    I do agree with you; however you still need to keep in mind that Pakistan is a country undergoing a change in government, still loaded to the brim with terrorist and terrorist supporters, and in posession of nuclear weapons (and have refused to sign the non-proliferation agreement). Are we (the U.S.) prepared to totally destroy Pakistan’s infrastructure if the need arises?

Leave a Comment

In order to leave a comment, you must supply information for all of the required fields below (which are indicated by bold text).

Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.