Skip this site's navigation and go to its main content


Receive Updates From Heritage

Receive Updates From Heritage

The Heritage Foundation
Leadership for America

Our Vision

Building an America where freedom, opportunity, prosperity, and civil society flourish.

About The Heritage Foundation

Founded in 1973, The Heritage Foundation is a research and educational institution—a think tank—whose mission is to formulate and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom, traditional American values, and a strong national defense. We believe the principles and ideas of the American Founding are worth conserving and renewing. As policy entrepreneurs, we believe the most effective solutions are consistent with those ideas and principles.


Corporate Progressivism Sets its Sites on the South

Posted November 24th, 2008 at 11:13am in Enterprise and Free Markets 1 Print This Post Print This Post

A major reason the Big Three auto makers can’t turn a profit as they are currently organized is due to the generous union contracts they signed years ago. As you can see below, the Big Three are paying about $25 more per hour than their domestic competitors:

unionwages.jpg

So what happens if Congress refuses to write a big check for the Big Three? don’t worry, they have a Plan B. MSNBC reports:

But what if the UAW could more easily organize workers at Honda and Hyundai? UAW-represented workers at Honda and Hyundai could then bargain for higher wages.

The Employee Free Choice Act, passed by the House of Representatives last year, but stymied n the Senate, aims to make unionization easier by allowing workers to join a union by signing a card rather than by going through a secret-ballot election. The bill is called “card check” for short.

The shrinkage of GM, partly due to competition from Honda, Hyundai, and other plants in Alabama and other states, has decimated the UAW.

A UAW ally, Rep. Tim Ryan, D- Ohio, said enactment of the Employee Free Choice Act “would level the playing field. Each facility would be competing on the same playing field.”

Got that? The left wants to do for the newly successful manufacturing states what the Big Three and unions did for Michigan. Oh, and by the way, MSNBC also reports:

The UAW’s political action committee spent $11.5 million to help Democratic candidates this year.

Now that’s some change you can pay for.

Tags:

One Response to “Corporate Progressivism Sets its Sites on the South”

  1. Spiritof76, New Hampshire on at said:

    The so called “Employee Free Choice Act” when enacted will spell disaster to the foreign auto plants, Wal-Mart etc. etc. Foreign companies will shift production elsewhere and jobs will be lost. American labor will not be attractive as its productivity will be dulled by the sudden jump in per hour cost of manufacture at those plants.
    What would happen if all the plants and small businesses shut their plants down right after the passage of the bill and lay off their employees? Only a heavy medicine like that will take care of the bullying tactics. American economy will come to screeching halt and the politicians will get the message. However, in order for that to be effective, over 90% of the businesses must cooperate. But, what a rebirth of our nation that would usher in where honest work/pay in a voluntary manner is once again part of our work ethic?

Leave a Comment

In order to leave a comment, you must supply information for all of the required fields below (which are indicated by bold text).

Comments are subject to approval and moderation. We remind everyone that The Heritage Foundation promotes a civil society where ideas and debate flourish. Please be respectful of each other and the subjects of any criticism. While we may not always agree on policy, we should all agree that being appropriately informed is everyone's intention visiting this site. Profanity, lewdness, personal attacks, and other forms of incivility will not be tolerated. Please keep your thoughts brief and avoid ALL CAPS. While we respect your first amendment rights, we are obligated to our readers to maintain these standards. Thanks for joining the conversation.

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.